Tags
apostrophes, Ed, George Bernard Shaw, Pedantry, Royal Tunbridge Wells, split infinitives, Tanya, The Oxford Comma
On Saturday mornings my other half and I usually stroll into Tunbridge Wells. It’s a pleasant walk alongside the Common and in spring there’s the glory of the municipal daffodils.
Yet on each journey I am affronted, disgusted even, by the lack of an apostrophe on the sign for Major York’s Road. I expect better from Royal Tunbridge Wells.
Should such things bug me? My husband doesn’t care about Major Yorks Road, yet mutters darkly about split infinitives whenever he catches me using them. He will also place exclamation marks (plural, notice) in the margins of any drafts of mine where a sentence starts with And. Other people’s blood pressure rises at mention of the Oxford Comma.
You might like to see some of our previous thoughts on this often contentious subject.
- https://ninevoices.wordpress.com/2016/10/19/grammar-gripes-less-and-fewer/,
- https://ninevoices.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/punctuation-can-cost-millions/
- https://ninevoices.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/a-plurality-of-grammars/
- https://ninevoices.wordpress.com/2016/06/07/to-be-pedantic-or-not-to-be-pedantic-that-is-the-question/)
As writers we surely have a duty to defend our wonderful language and how it’s placed on the page. However, knowing what is correct, but deliberately bending the rules, can be excusable, and hopefully creative.
So, on that question of split infinitives, let me share something George Bernard Shaw wrote to his publishers:
There is a busybody on your staff who devotes a lot of time to chasing split infinitives. Every good literary craftsman splits his infinitives when the sense demands it. I call for the immediate dismissal of this pedant. It is of no consequence whether he decides to go quickly, or quickly to go, or to quickly go. The important thing is that he should go at once.
Your views on grammar pedantry are welcome. Don’t be shy, we’d love to hear from you!
This post was discussed at our bi-monthly writing day yesterday, and it was suggested I sneak into Tunbridge Wells at dusk one day with a marker pen or small pot of black paint. I then envisaged local rage at the rate increases that might be levied to replace the sign…
I think apostrophes look wrong on road signs, which might explain why I’ve gone past it so many times without noticing. I’d be more inclined to prise off the S…
…and replace it with an ‘e’, apparently. I’m now informed the guy was Major Yorke…
During visits to both hospitals, I have found the apostrophe comes in many guises. Guy’s or Guys’.or Guys. St Thomas’s or St Thomas or St Thomas’. St Thomas is interesting. We say: Margaret. Davies’s house so why not St Thomas’s? I seem to remember David Crystal suggesting that Jesus, being universally known, is a special case. Hence Jesus’ disciples.
Either way, oh please – whoever makes the decision in some anonymous office somewhere – may we have consistency?
Frustrated from.Kent